Unbound in your area...Abused or not?

[deinol]

I've been using unbound to play harlequins for a while now. And by unbound, I mostly mean buying raiders and venoms for my harlequins. I haven't tried the new codex yet, but I suspect I'll still play unbound just to get raiders. Of course, archon as great harlequin and a couple squads of raiders would be easy enough to make it a real detachment. But then I'd need to get around to buying raiders.

My area nobody cares as long as you aren't being an *******. And there are plenty of ways to be an ******* and still be bound.

[Zaonite]

Unbound in my group is a gentleman's agreement. I.e. you tell your opponent beforehand that you are unbound and what you are taking, allowing them some leeway and letting them change up their army list if needs be.

[Asymmetrical Xeno]

I like the idea of Unbound to play heavily themed armies that are fluffy. I'd like to do an all-canoptek force. If someone thought the army was overpowered, I'd be only too happy to compromise by allowing them some advantages or something to balance things out too. Then again, I'm not a competitive person in the least and never really cared about winning at all (not that I wouldn't try to as it is the goal of the game)