I disagree.
People only take responsibility for themselves when pressured to do so.
I disagree.
People only take responsibility for themselves when pressured to do so.
QUOTE Jwolf: "Besides, Tynskel isn't evil, he's just drawn that way. "
Step 1:
(this one is hard)
READ THE RULES!
Main Rule Book, Page 85 TANKS Tanks can use their mass as a weapon, driving right into and through densely packed enemies. This often throws the opposing battle line into disarray, as having some monstrous metal behemoth coming straight at you is unnerving for anybody. TANK SHOCK When moving a Tank the player can declare that it is going to attempt to Tank Shock instead of moving normally.
Step 2:
READ THE FAQs
Step 3:
...
Step 4:
Profit!
I swear I must be doing this wrong...
There is an oxfam advert that runs which says:
I think this can be adapted for the wargames community:Give a man a fish and he can feed himself for a day. Give a man the means to catch his own fish and he can feed himself and his family for a lifetime
Give a gamer an answer and it solves his one question. Give the gamer the means to read the rules and he can answer every question for himself and his family for a lifetime
Fan of Fuggles | Derailment of the Wolfpack of Horsemen | In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
You are wrong.
The Magna Grapple says the dragged vehicle performs a tank shock if it hits an unengaged infantry unit.
Now, I think I recall that you won't tank shock through your own unit, which would negate this entire argument.
Again, I ask, what was the point of this thread?
QUOTE Jwolf: "Besides, Tynskel isn't evil, he's just drawn that way. "
Borderline alcoholic and happy about it.
Don't get your religion mixed with my Constitution. The mixture curdles.