40K Book Missions unbalanced?

[Mr Mystery]

+1 to that brother!


Speaking of which, I have a Cityfight for tomorrow. Time to dig out Cities of Death and bone up on my rules!

[the jeske]

so, it's not the mission. it's his list.

only half the dexs out there[all old+nids] cant build "balanced" lists . One may as well say dont play dex X,Y,Z because they suck then .

at the same time necron more or less ignore the scenarios they are playing . the only problems they face is if they AB are going to be scoring or not.

[Mr Mystery]

only half the dexs out there[all old+nids] cant build "balanced" lists . One may as well say dont play dex X,Y,Z because they suck then .

at the same time necron more or less ignore the scenarios they are playing . the only problems they face is if they AB are going to be scoring or not.

Bunkum. All Codecies present a range of units, and most have a tactical gap somewhere by deliberate design, just as they have an area where they tend to excel. A balanced army has a wide selection of the available units.

And trust me, I'm successful with my Necrons because I focus on the Mission, rather than wiping out my opponent. Go for the secondary objectives first (bit of luck and I can bag two for one by slotting the enemy Warlord first) to give me a solid upper hand (these can be wrested from me), secure a primary objective of my own, and then focus on denial against my opponent. Pow. Playing to the mission and winning.

[Uncle Nutsy]

only half the dexs out there[all old+nids] cant build "balanced" lists . One may as well say dont play dex X,Y,Z because they suck then .

at the same time necron more or less ignore the scenarios they are playing . the only problems they face is if they AB are going to be scoring or not.

yeah right. I bet you any money I could build a balanced list with any dex.