IG FAQ is up
[URL="http://www.games-workshop.com/MEDIA_CustomProductCatalog/m470041a_FAQ_ImperialGuard_2009.pdf"]http://www.games-workshop.com/MEDIA_CustomProductCatalog/m470041a_FAQ_ImperialGuard_2009.pdf[/URL]
BoLS Lounge : Wargames, Warhammer & Miniatures Forum
Results 1 to 10 of 39
Thread: IG FAQ is up
-
09-03-2009, 01:23 PM #1Scout
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Posts
- 12
IG FAQ is up
-
09-03-2009, 01:46 PM #2Banned
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- Sydney, Australia
- Posts
- 6,452
Wow, it covered pretty much everything... I'm impressed.
-
09-03-2009, 01:51 PM #3Brother-Sergeant
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 90
Hmmm... Clarification on hot-shot lasguns and FRFSRF is good. However, I predict there will be some ranting about the "Advisor benefits don't stack" and "No taking Demolishers ect. with WH/DH" bits...
-
09-03-2009, 01:52 PM #4Battle-Brother
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Borås - Sweden
- Posts
- 37
Neat, and about time...
*gets lost in a PDF file soon located on your computerscreens*
-
09-03-2009, 01:59 PM #5Scout
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 15
I'm impressed, a GW FAQ that actually answers relevant questions... Did I miss some kind of change in policy?
-
09-03-2009, 02:02 PM #6Chapter-Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 2,736
Looks good, happy with all that.
I can see many a tournament bun fight averted there.To a New Yorker like you a hero is some kinda weird sandwich, not some nut who takes on three Tigers!
-
09-03-2009, 02:38 PM #7Veteran-Sergeant
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- Ohio
- Posts
- 187
Has to be the best 5e FAQ they've put out so far.
Unlike that DREK they served up for the space marines, it covered the MOST prevalent and topical queries.
Would have been nice to have some clarification on PBS status (single unit OR model count as psyker count, I know what I think RAW is...but there are those that don't agree).
I don't agree with the lack of Advisor stacking, but frankly didn't double up on them anyway, so doesn't affect me (2nd HQ for me is normally an inq w/phood and mystics).
Love the call on the GKT's.
Not sure about the Leman Russ call...but I get it.
overall, as well as I could have hoped from GW! (other than way too long!)
"Sometimes I take humor seriously. Sometimes I take seriousness humorously. Either way it is irrelevant"
-
09-03-2009, 02:47 PM #8Battle-Brother
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 21
Its too bad about the advisors, but I'm glad they addressed it (and even more glad they addressed the Valkerie passenger issue).
Although doesn't this make the valk act rather like an open topped vehicle since it now ignores its own access points.
Jack
-
09-03-2009, 03:11 PM #9Scout
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Posts
- 7
Like they said though, it makes sense. Having two Astropath on different part of a battlefield giving contradictory information to reserves could in fact be liability in "real life".
The section on Inquisition books is quite good also. Orders had some cheesy potentials there and I'm glad they made that point clear: no ordering around geneticaly engineered super-human in Terminator armour!
-
09-03-2009, 03:45 PM #10Brother-Sergeant
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 83
I am both pleased and relieved to have this.
Reply With Quote
