Old One Eye Abuse

[Tynskel]

Berserk Rampage
every successful To Hit roll Old One Eye immediately makes one additional attack.

Now, does this stack with Hammer of Wrath? (Especially since Old One Eye has Living Battering Ram?)

I don't have the Main Rulebook with me (not for a few weeks), so i cannot check this...

[Captain Bubonicus]

Sorry, I'm too busy giggling at "Old One Eye Abuse."

[Chris Copeland]

Doesn't Hammer of Wrath hit automatically? No roll? This wouldn't stack, then.

Also, there is nothing new about abusing ol' One Eye... chaps do it all the time...

[Anakzar]

I am not sure what you are asking but Hammer of wrath attacks don't roll to hit, they hit automatically so...

I would say do the hammer of wrath attacks at int step 10 and you don't get extra attacks for them. The attacks that roll to hit come at one eye's int step and those are the ones that get the extra attacks. (it also excludes the tail attack).

[Tynskel]

Doesn't Hammer of Wrath hit automatically? No roll? This wouldn't stack, then.

Also, there is nothing new about abusing ol' One Eye... chaps do it all the time...

That's really my question, Is Hammer of Wrath considered a successful To Hit roll.

[YorkNecromancer]

There's no 'roll', so it wouldn't seem to, going on the specific wording.

Of course, it would be awesome if it did...

[Houghten]

I doubt it. Hammer of Wrath doesn't benefit from special weapons and it doesn't benefit from rules like Smash; I shouldn't think other rules get to benefit from it either (mind you, they did FAQ Baron Sathonyx's skyboard to affect his Hammer of Wrath attacks, so you never know...)

[Tynskel]

I just get this image of the old Old One Eye model running in and just stomping on things, while making swinging arcs with the crushing claws...

[musical-fool]

Sorry, I'm too busy giggling at "Old One Eye Abuse."

I just lol'd at this and got a strange look from the wife. Immature? Moi!?

[Broodingman87]

There's no 'roll', so it wouldn't seem to, going on the specific wording.

Of course, it would be awesome if it did...

But, a malifaction psychic power can ground a FMC because it's considered a hit even though you didn't roll to hit it.

[Tynskel]

I am pretty sure it doesn't work that way.

[John Bower]

Sorely doubt it, if already excludes smash and tail and as HoW don't really count as 'attacks' as such it's unlikely. If (big if there judging by GW's recent form) it's FAQ'd it will probly be a no.

[Dlatrex]

Tangential to this; does HoW get 'slowed' by moving through difficult terrain? It says you attack at Initiative 1, so would that trump the HoW initiative 10 characteristic?

[Tynskel]

Tangential to this; does HoW get 'slowed' by moving through difficult terrain? It says you attack at Initiative 1, so would that trump the HoW initiative 10 characteristic?

Hammer of wrath is a set value of 10I

[Tynskel]

Sorely doubt it, if already excludes smash and tail and as HoW don't really count as 'attacks' as such it's unlikely. If (big if there judging by GW's recent form) it's FAQ'd it will probly be a no.
It only excludes the tail attack. Not smash. But why would old one eye smash... She's already str 10

[DarkLink]

But, a malifaction psychic power can ground a FMC because it's considered a hit even though you didn't roll to hit it.

Not a shooting attack, ergo, no grounding check. Only Witchfires can do this.

[OlDirtyCosta]

The rulebook states "every successful To Hit Roll" since you dont roll for HoW I dont think it works..... A little cloudy but, thats my interpretation..