Wolfshade
10-18-2013, 02:40 AM
Perhaps this quote from Canada's Globe and Mail:
The strong bipartisan endorsement of a solution that did little but push forward two deadlines for another two months invites two questions: What was it all for, and what will keep it from happening again? Mr. Boehner and his party's restive Tea Party faction also will be under the microscope, as it was unclear whether the events of the past few weeks strengthened Mr. Boehner's control of his caucus, or weakened him in the eyes of hard-liners who put 'principle' ahead of pragmatism.
Or my personal favourite from the Times of India:
The United States seems intent on proving the Churchillian assessment that 'one can always 'count on the Americans to do the right thing - after they have exhausted all the other possibilities'. The world heaved a sigh of relief that some resolution, even if it is a temporary fix, is in the works.
This debarcle could happen all over again come January 15/16.
The President won and the Republicans lost that is how it is.
The question is what does this actually mean.
For Obama fans it is a brilliant show of strength that he will not be cowed from enacting what he set out to do.
Then there is the message to the Republicnas that there is no point picking this fight again as he will not back down.
For those who aren't so keen on him or are more conservative it will push them away, some will argue that he is ignoring the legitmate role of the house and refusing to negotiate. It may even make it harder to pass other more contraversial bills on things like the environment, immigration and gun control.
The Republican's certain came off worse, the party's poll rating took a dive, though whether that actually is enough to convert an actual republican voter to a democrat voter is debateable, I assume that the majority of voters vote for a party because they always have and always will. (In the same way over here people always vote red or blue in certain areas).
What did Boehner actually achieve with this? Well he is know (more) known internationally. But it looks like he has issues controlling members of the party, but the Republicans still stand as a single entity.
The strong bipartisan endorsement of a solution that did little but push forward two deadlines for another two months invites two questions: What was it all for, and what will keep it from happening again? Mr. Boehner and his party's restive Tea Party faction also will be under the microscope, as it was unclear whether the events of the past few weeks strengthened Mr. Boehner's control of his caucus, or weakened him in the eyes of hard-liners who put 'principle' ahead of pragmatism.
Or my personal favourite from the Times of India:
The United States seems intent on proving the Churchillian assessment that 'one can always 'count on the Americans to do the right thing - after they have exhausted all the other possibilities'. The world heaved a sigh of relief that some resolution, even if it is a temporary fix, is in the works.
This debarcle could happen all over again come January 15/16.
The President won and the Republicans lost that is how it is.
The question is what does this actually mean.
For Obama fans it is a brilliant show of strength that he will not be cowed from enacting what he set out to do.
Then there is the message to the Republicnas that there is no point picking this fight again as he will not back down.
For those who aren't so keen on him or are more conservative it will push them away, some will argue that he is ignoring the legitmate role of the house and refusing to negotiate. It may even make it harder to pass other more contraversial bills on things like the environment, immigration and gun control.
The Republican's certain came off worse, the party's poll rating took a dive, though whether that actually is enough to convert an actual republican voter to a democrat voter is debateable, I assume that the majority of voters vote for a party because they always have and always will. (In the same way over here people always vote red or blue in certain areas).
What did Boehner actually achieve with this? Well he is know (more) known internationally. But it looks like he has issues controlling members of the party, but the Republicans still stand as a single entity.