Typos in new Daemons Codex

[Eric French]

Dangit! after Warren over at BoW went off on the DA book having typos I was hoping to find none in the New Daemons codex, alas after the second read through I have seen one. Blue Horror Crew. "...of one of more"

poo


BLNT with the editing GW, I'm available it only took me twice to find one haha. Any one else see any?

[Learn2Eel]

No, and I barely noticed them in Dark Angels either. Typos don't bother me honestly. Though I think I noticed one on one of the Khorne Daemon pages. Aside from that, nuh.

[Cap'nSmurfs]

I'm bored of all these 'OMG typos' threads.

[Deadlift]

Goodniss if yoo hat the tipes in the codix, these forims mist bee modder for yee.

[Houghten]

I didn't know you could speak Chaucerian English!

[KrewL RaiN]

My favorite is in the Bloodthirsters fluff: "A Bloodthirster w ho fails in his command..." How did they not catch that!

[Deadlift]

I didn't know you could speak Chaucerian English!

Lol, full of surprises aren't I ;). Seriously though when you pay £30 for the book you shouldn't expect it to be full of spelling mistakes etc.

[RGilbert26]

Every book published has typos in it and im not bothered by them.

It's when a book has important mistakes in them such as entire sections of the armylist section needing an errata to fix them, or when you download the digital version and a paragraph of fluff appears from another book. That's when im bothered.

[alshrive]

Every book published has typos in it and im not bothered by them.


Surely our biggest fear should be typo's in the dictionary?

[Wolfshade]

Surely our biggest fear should be typo's in the dictionary?

I have e-mailed Merriam-Webster several times but they do not reply...