Wolfshade
12-05-2012, 08:47 AM
Well now, the chancellor has delievered this new statement outlining plans and the what not.
I think the worrying thing is that the structual deficiet still stands at around 4% with some estimates pushing it up to 4.9% which is greater than the 4.8% we had when he started and this is on the top of billions saved/slashed.
I think there are two things which will have some effect on all of us, firstly the planned 3p rise in fuel duty is being held, which let's face it we pay incredible amounts on fuel duty anyway.
http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/64588000/gif/_64588098_petrol_breakdown304x400.gif
Secondly the non-taxable threshold will increase to £9,440, which won't really make that much of a difference but still it is better than nothing.
Most benefits will rise by 1%, which although is an increase is in real terms a slight decrease as inflation is at 2.2% (depending on which measure you actually use). The ISA allowance again sees a modest rise 2.1%.
So the question is, is this method working?
The opponets will look at the figures and say, well all this scrimping and savings has shown very little return if any at addressing teh issues of structual deficiet.
The proponents will see the figures and say, things haven't got any worse, there are positive signs with many areas comming in under budget and savings being address, unemployment figures better than expected, just keep on doing what we are only maybe be even more harsher with it.
I think the worrying thing is that the structual deficiet still stands at around 4% with some estimates pushing it up to 4.9% which is greater than the 4.8% we had when he started and this is on the top of billions saved/slashed.
I think there are two things which will have some effect on all of us, firstly the planned 3p rise in fuel duty is being held, which let's face it we pay incredible amounts on fuel duty anyway.
http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/64588000/gif/_64588098_petrol_breakdown304x400.gif
Secondly the non-taxable threshold will increase to £9,440, which won't really make that much of a difference but still it is better than nothing.
Most benefits will rise by 1%, which although is an increase is in real terms a slight decrease as inflation is at 2.2% (depending on which measure you actually use). The ISA allowance again sees a modest rise 2.1%.
So the question is, is this method working?
The opponets will look at the figures and say, well all this scrimping and savings has shown very little return if any at addressing teh issues of structual deficiet.
The proponents will see the figures and say, things haven't got any worse, there are positive signs with many areas comming in under budget and savings being address, unemployment figures better than expected, just keep on doing what we are only maybe be even more harsher with it.