Redknight
07-10-2012, 04:51 PM
what are your thoughts on this situation ~ I thought it was clear cut but my opponent didnt .
I have 4 wraiths ( 2 either side of a wall ) , my opponent wants to assault with a unit of Salamander Assault Termies led by Vulkan who are charging at an oblique angle to me. He rolls his charge distance ( using 2 dice ) and gets a 7 , a 6 and a 1 . This would allow nearest model [Vulkan] to reach the 4" to wraith 1 and allow termie 1 to reach the second wraith . Does Termie 2 however now HAVE to charge the 3rd Wraith who is behind the wall ? I thought so ~ but now this is in difficult ground so my opponent shouldve rolled another dice and used the lowest 2 . He rolls the extra dice and gets a 2, so now his assault distance is 3 " which means the assault shouldve failed in the first place ?? Is that right ? He was arguing that because the other 2 were behind cover which he couldnt reach then he was able to just attack the ones he could reach on his side of the wall .
I have 4 wraiths ( 2 either side of a wall ) , my opponent wants to assault with a unit of Salamander Assault Termies led by Vulkan who are charging at an oblique angle to me. He rolls his charge distance ( using 2 dice ) and gets a 7 , a 6 and a 1 . This would allow nearest model [Vulkan] to reach the 4" to wraith 1 and allow termie 1 to reach the second wraith . Does Termie 2 however now HAVE to charge the 3rd Wraith who is behind the wall ? I thought so ~ but now this is in difficult ground so my opponent shouldve rolled another dice and used the lowest 2 . He rolls the extra dice and gets a 2, so now his assault distance is 3 " which means the assault shouldve failed in the first place ?? Is that right ? He was arguing that because the other 2 were behind cover which he couldnt reach then he was able to just attack the ones he could reach on his side of the wall .