joedrache
07-08-2012, 12:06 PM
my head hurts from beating it against the brb!
here's how i understand it now-
in a group where all armor saves are the same- a character, who is out front, taking the first wounds can either
roll his own armor save fail it, then roll LoS, succeed, and another model within 6 dies without a save, instead of him.
or
he can elect to not roll his own save and if passing LoS make another guy roll that save.
BUT
in a group of mixed armor saves, the character taking wounds CANT roll his own save, fail, LoS and make someone else die instead.
INSTEAD,
he has to LoS first, make someone else take the save
is this right?
why?
where in the rulebook does it spell this out?
you'd think a radical rules change like this would be more clearly worded, i dont see this in the text. it looks to me like any character can LoS any wound, or his own failed armor save any time he wants.
where does it say that is not so?
for the record, i hope it isnt.
here's how i understand it now-
in a group where all armor saves are the same- a character, who is out front, taking the first wounds can either
roll his own armor save fail it, then roll LoS, succeed, and another model within 6 dies without a save, instead of him.
or
he can elect to not roll his own save and if passing LoS make another guy roll that save.
BUT
in a group of mixed armor saves, the character taking wounds CANT roll his own save, fail, LoS and make someone else die instead.
INSTEAD,
he has to LoS first, make someone else take the save
is this right?
why?
where in the rulebook does it spell this out?
you'd think a radical rules change like this would be more clearly worded, i dont see this in the text. it looks to me like any character can LoS any wound, or his own failed armor save any time he wants.
where does it say that is not so?
for the record, i hope it isnt.