Arjan84
06-08-2011, 02:50 PM
hello,
as the title suggests, i want to know what is better to play.
i have a copy of the warhammer fantasy rulebook, and both undead books. yet i totally like the mantic undead, by which i mean i can have necromancers with zombies, skeletons and war machines in one list. in warhammer i either have zombies or warmachines, not both.
some say i could better stick to fantasy, others say kings of war is simple but has high stategic value, more so then warhamer.
in costs mantic wins with it's free rulebook and armylists. GW is costing a small fortune nowadays to get started with rules, let alone miniatures.
i'm completely new to play both games(am known with 40K).
so what is your opinion? kings of war with it's minimal rules, or warhammer fantasy with it's 100 page rules(or something).
Arjan
as the title suggests, i want to know what is better to play.
i have a copy of the warhammer fantasy rulebook, and both undead books. yet i totally like the mantic undead, by which i mean i can have necromancers with zombies, skeletons and war machines in one list. in warhammer i either have zombies or warmachines, not both.
some say i could better stick to fantasy, others say kings of war is simple but has high stategic value, more so then warhamer.
in costs mantic wins with it's free rulebook and armylists. GW is costing a small fortune nowadays to get started with rules, let alone miniatures.
i'm completely new to play both games(am known with 40K).
so what is your opinion? kings of war with it's minimal rules, or warhammer fantasy with it's 100 page rules(or something).
Arjan